The success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region demonstrates the effectiveness of Ukrainian military planning. Key aspects of the operation:
- Maintaining the secrecy of training.
- Choosing an unexpected direction of impact.
- Speed and efficiency of execution.
- Significant psychological impact on the enemy.
It is important to note that the full details of any major operation are known only to the highest command. Therefore, public assessments by individuals not directly involved in planning may be based on incomplete data. For example, statements about the alleged unpreparedness of certain units or areas do not take into account the overall strategic picture. The command, having full information, makes decisions based on all factors.
Criticism without a full understanding of the situation could inadvertently undermine the credibility of the military leadership and lower morale. During this critical period, it is important to remain united and support our Armed Forces. Instead of spreading doubt, society can focus on constructive support for the army and the state. The success of the Kursk operation demonstrates that with the right strategy and the support of the people, Ukraine is capable of achieving significant military victories.
But not everyone in the country likes this positive development. The struggle for power, including influence over the Armed Forces, has created a team of allies who surprise even the most ardent oppositionists with their statements. “It seems that the Kursk operation could have been planned not only in Ukraine and precisely with the aim of pulling our troops away from the east ,” writes Taras Chornovil. “The plan looked like a one-way “task 200″,” – writes Mariana Bezuhla. Where does such unity come from among seemingly irreconcilable political opponents?
Bezuhla’s motives can be traced in the paragraph about the DSHV. After all, there you can find confirmation of all the long-standing rumors about her too tender attitude towards Yevhen Moysiuk. On January 25, when Valeriy Zaluzhny was still the Chief of the Armed Forces, she called Moysiuk one of the candidates for replacement and, although few people noticed it at the time, she gave him the most complimentary assessment: “He will be able to reformat the armed forces in accordance with modern requirements.” And in the photo, he was the first to go, not as in the text.
But what was Moisyuk responsible for under Zaluzhny’s leadership? Namely, for the unsuccessful counteroffensive in Zaporizhzhia region, which Bezuhla herself is now blaming anyone for. An operation that burned a significant portion of Western weapons and trained and motivated brigades. As those who fought in that area say today: if only we had at least half of what we had then, we would have already been near Moscow!
Bezugla cites the example of Emil Ishkulov : “Unable to stand this attitude, one of the most authoritative commanders of paratroopers, the brigadier of the 80th Brigade, Emil Ishkulov, openly told the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine that the task was unrealistic.” But as we noted above, only the high command knew about all the details of the operation in Kursk. And it is quite likely that this undoubtedly talented and authoritative commander did not receive all the information in order to succeed. For reasons that proved effective and created the effect of surprise for the enemy.
But let’s recall how at that time the Ukrainian segment of social networks was taken over by an epidemic of solving personnel issues in the Armed Forces through public posts. When decisions were dictated not by military expediency, but by media publicity. It was painfully reminiscent of how the Bolsheviks destroyed the armies of their enemies through agitation a hundred years ago. And what the current Chekists from the Lubyanka are still good at.
Just imagine what would have happened if the top leadership of the state had not withstood this pressure? Nevertheless, we must thank the Supreme Commander-in-Chief for his wisdom in giving the most significant operation of the Ukrainian army so far a chance to take place. And for rejecting the criticism and intrigues of politicians and individual MPs.
No wonder Mariana Bezuhla is among the leaders of quotes by Russian propaganda!