Консервативна Платформа
  • News
    • Analytics
    • Worldview
    • Anti-imperial front
    • Weapons
    • Geopolitics
  • publication
  • Position.
  • Events.
Thursday, August 27, 2026
  • English
    • Ukrainian
Консервативна Платформа
  • News
    • Analytics
    • Worldview
    • Anti-imperial front
    • Weapons
    • Geopolitics
  • publication
  • Position.
  • Events.
Консервативна Платформа
Консервативна Платформа
  • News
    • Analytics
    • Worldview
    • Anti-imperial front
    • Weapons
    • Geopolitics
  • publication
  • Position.
  • Events.
Copyright 2021 - All Right Reserved
Analytics

Ronald Reagan is a true conservative in the White House

від Майданюк Валерій October 20, 2024

An actor who became president, strengthened the army, boosted the country’s economy, and contributed to the collapse of the “evil empire” – this is about Ronald Reagan, a conservative who knew how to deal with Russia.

Ronald Reagan was born in Illinois in 1911 to a family of Irish and Scottish descent. His mother was a member of the Protestant church, and his father drank a lot. Because of his father, the future president almost never drank alcohol until the end of his life. In the 1930s, Reagan moved to Los Angeles, where he began his career as an actor. He appeared in about 77 films and was a sports commentator. When World War II broke out in 1941, Reagan volunteered for the army, but because of his poor eyesight, he was left in the United States to make training and patriotic films to boost army morale.

In 1964, Reagan met with influential Republican politicians and businessmen, whom he impressed. Party leaders invited him to run for governor of California, which he won in 1966. Reagan also tried to run for the presidency, but was defeated twice. It was only in 1980 that Ronald Reagan managed to win the election and defeat the Democratic candidate and incumbent President Jimmy Carter.

The policy of the Republican president was based on classical conservative principles: reducing government intervention in the economy, cutting taxes, and focusing on the immediate and most important responsibilities of the head of state – defense and foreign policy. Criticizing his predecessors, Reagan noted: “A government’s view of the economy can be summarized in a few short phrases: If something moves, tax it; if it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops, subsidize it.” Trying not to repeat the bureaucratic mistakes of his opponents, Reagan, during the first three years of his presidency, annually reduced the income tax by 10%.

Reagan, a conservative White House leader, pursued a strategy of less regulation of the economy, cutting government spending – primarily on bureaucrats – and controlling inflation. His economic policy was called “Reaganomics” by the press, and it was this model that revitalized the country and overcame the crisis. As a result of Reaganomics, the inflow of foreign investment improved, industrial capacity increased, unemployment decreased from 11 to 5.5%, the US share of industrial production increased, and the national economy revived.

Under Reagan, the military, which Democrats had paid little attention to, became the No. 1 priority. “In 1981, when I took the presidency in the White House,” Reagan recalled of the beginning of his presidency, “the fibers of the military muscle were so atrophied that our ability to successfully repel a possible attack from the Soviet Union was very doubtful: no fighters were flying, no warships were sailing. Our best sons and daughters were leaving military service, the morale of the volunteer army was in decline, and our strategic weapons had not been modernized for decades. At the same time, the Soviet Union was creating a military machine that threatened to surpass ours at every level. I wanted to sit down at the negotiating table to put an end to this ridiculous policy of “mutually assured destruction,” but to do so, America first needed to increase its military power. Then we could negotiate from a position of strength, not weakness,” Reagan recalled.

In his famous 1983 speech, Reagan proclaimed the USSR an “evil empire.” And no matter how unbecoming of a leader, the truth was spoken from the highest rostrum. At that time, Moscow was destroying the people of Afghanistan, had practically crushed the dissident movement, and the country was dominated by “andropovschina” – calling black white was contrary to Reagan’s traditional conservative principles.

The American leader abandoned the “détente” policy destroyed by the Kremlin, began rearming the army and supporting anti-communist movements around the world. In 1983, a large-scale program to achieve US military superiority in space was launched, which the press dubbed “Star Wars.” Significantly, the program itself had a dual purpose: to force the USSR into a debilitating economic confrontation and weaken its resources. Reagan knew that the Russians in the Kremlin would spare nothing to get ahead of the United States in the space arms race, so he provoked them into an expensive and costly program that crippled the Soviet economy.

According to economists, the global drop in oil prices in 1986, when oil fell from $32 to $8 per barrel, was due to Reagan’s foreign policy of undermining the main export item of the USSR. Reagan managed to persuade the Saudis to take a short-term unprofitable but strategically extremely important and victorious step to maximize the production of “black gold,” which, with its quantity on the market, would have collapsed the price.

It was Reagan’s political initiatives that in 3 years led to the fall of communist regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, mass protests of enslaved peoples in the USSR, and soon the collapse of the “evil empire.” Today’s American Republican conservatives are sorely lacking the state wisdom, geopolitical strategy, and understanding of the Moscow regime that Ronald Reagan possessed.

Author: Valeriy Maydanyuk

October 20, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Analytics

Modernization as a super-task for Ukraine

від Майданюк Валерій October 19, 2024

Today, Ukraine needs radical reforms and modernization of both social life and material resources. There is virtually no sector where Ukraine is doing well. There are acute problems in the humanitarian, cultural, information, healthcare, and defense sectors. A separate issue is the political and legal, public administration and party systems.

An important point is that modernization should be implemented as a way to overcome the Soviet legacy. Modernization should be comprehensive, carried out primarily in the public authorities, which should become promoters of its implementation among the broad masses of Ukrainians. Such modernization should affect both the material and humanitarian, scientific, and information spheres. The country needs to upgrade its infrastructure – roads, railways, airports – as well as its economic relations, social protection, and healthcare – in short, everything. However, our country does not have sufficient resources for such an important civilizational leap. We can’t really count on foreign aid.

We must adopt some viable scheme that will allow us to take meaningful steps in this direction. The most important step, in our opinion, would be to renew and reform the state and political sphere. The government agencies and political parties that form the majority in parliament should become promoters of change, reform and modernization. Without them, most efforts will be in vain and at best half-hearted.

Therefore, the first step should be a radical reform of the state and political sphere, and this primarily concerns the parties in parliament and the media. If such a reform is carried out, then society will have a subject of such reforms that will try to implement them. Modernization will be carried out not against the will of the government, but according to its plan, and it will be responsible for it.

The very notion of an “honest judge” was considered almost an oxymoron, and the situation in law enforcement was not much better. In fact, it can be recognized that the judicial and law enforcement systems in Ukraine have been completely devalued, and they have become not a service for citizens, but only an obstacle to the establishment of justice or fairness.

It is important to understand that these reforms cannot be done by half measures, but require decisive action to cleanse the industry of the total filth that has enveloped it.

Suggestions:

  • Restructuring the civil service system according to Western models
  • Reform of the party and media spheres
  • Restructuring the humanitarian sphere of Ukraine. Changes in education, healthcare, and cultural programs
  • Creating new infrastructure opportunities for Ukraine – highways, airports, and maritime infrastructure.

Author: Yuriy Mindyuk

October 19, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
in Russia

Cyberattacks by the GRU paralyzed the Russian judicial system and caused personnel changes

від Юрій Гончаренко October 15, 2024

Systemic cyberattacks by the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine on the IT infrastructure of the aggressor country Russia have led to personnel changes in the leadership of the enemy’s public sector. It is worth noting that the new “specialists” in the positions lead to an even greater deepening of the problems and worsen the situation for Russian cybersecurity. This was reported by online.ua’ s sources in Ukrainian intelligence.

Main theses:

  • The GRU carried out one of the most powerful cyberattacks, paralyzing the Russian judicial system.
  • Ukrainian intelligence managed to find many weaknesses in the cybersecurity of the aggressor country.
  • The Kremlin’s personnel purges have made the situation worse, not better.

What is known about the results of the DIU’s cyber war against Russia

According to intelligence insiders, after a series of hacker attacks on the Kremlin’s financial and judicial infrastructure, Almaz Tagirovich Ibragimov was appointed the new head of the Information and Judicial Department at the Russian Supreme Court.

What is important to understand is that this person, whose professional competencies are highly questionable, filled his subordinate structures with his own people.

In particular, a certain Ivanov V.A. was appointed to the post of Director General of the Judicial Department. After that, Ukrainian intelligence launched another cyberattack, in particular, the state system “Pravosuddya” was hit, which ceased to function properly as a result of the attack.

Ukrainian intelligence also managed to find out that the new management team, consisting mainly of natives of Buryatia and Tyumen, was completely unable to solve the problem.

De facto, it does not have and does not know where to find qualified personnel who could try to restore Pravosuddie and cope with the consequences of the GUR cyberattacks.

Ukrainian intelligence managed to paralyze the judicial system of the aggressor country, and the occupiers’ judiciary reverted from digital interaction to sending paper letters by Russian Post.

Details of one of the most powerful cyberattacks of the GUR against Russia

As mentioned earlier, on October 7, 2024, the hacker group “VO Team” in cooperation with the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine “congratulated” Russian dictator Vladimir Putin on his birthday and hacked the state automated system “Pravosudie”.

What is important to understand is that it was used for electronic document flow in all courts of the aggressor country.

The attack paralyzed the work of courts, departmental e-mails and official websites. The hackers also obtained personal data of users and internal documentation of the system. Currently, the Russians report that it is impossible to file lawsuits and view court dates, and court websites are down.

According to DIU sources, the hacking became possible due to the illiteracy of Russian cyber specialists in security, as well as due to holes in the much-hyped Russian cybersecurity systems from Kaspersky Lab, Positive Technologies and IVK JSC.

October 15, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Analytics

Why do “majors” need free meals?

від Майданюк Валерій October 13, 2024

A country fighting for independence on borrowed money and asking for foreign financial aid has decided to introduce a free school meals initiative that the richest countries in Europe cannot afford.

According to a statement on the website of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, starting in October, the government will provide free one-time meals for students in grades 1-4. For this purpose, at the initiative of the President of Ukraine, UAH 2 billion was allocated from the budget for 2024 to local communities in the form of a subvention. According to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a total of UAH 5.8 billion is allocated for this program.

Previously, only students in privileged categories were provided with free lunches in Ukraine: orphans, children deprived of parental care, children from low-income families, IDPs and other vulnerable categories, including certain categories of children of veterans. According to the ministry, this government initiative will help to form good eating habits from an early age. The Ministry of Education and Science explained that the subvention can be used both to purchase food and to pay for catering and/or outsourcing services. Suppliers are certainly happy to receive new orders, but for the economy of a country at war, such a social initiative seems like an excessive burden.

For people who pay higher taxes this month, donate their last dime to the Armed Forces, and see the frankly miserable economic situation in the country, it may seem that journalists have mistakenly picked up this news from German or British websites. Especially when Ukrainians hear in the news how Ukraine is asking Western countries to finance the production of Ukrainian weapons at Ukrainian military plants. In particular, this year Denmark will finance and pay for the production of 18 Ukrainian Bohdan self-propelled artillery systems. In other words, it will buy them from Ukrainian manufacturers and give them to Ukraine (!). The Ukrainian budget simply does not have the money for this, officials say.

But in German and British schools, there are no universal free meals for all. These countries are not used to wasting taxpayers’ money and paying for the meals of the children of the rich and middle class, who often also attend public schools. Margaret Thatcher in Britain, who abolished free milk for schoolchildren in the 1980s, stated bluntly: “there is no such thing as free milk”. Thatcher often repeated that there is no public money in the country, only taxpayers’ money.

Only Sweden, Finland, and Estonia provide free meals for schoolchildren of all ages . In a number of countries, including Austria, France, Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Bulgaria, Italy, Poland, Romania, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Germany, Hungary, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Portugal, Spain, Slovakia, and Slovenia, free meals are provided for children from low-income families or in poorer regions, which is quite natural and fair.

But Ukraine is obviously richer than the Netherlands or Austria if it can afford elements of social policy that even the richest EU countries cannot afford. Ordinary Ukrainians are well aware of the foreign cars, Lexuses, and Teslas that clog the parking lots of Ukrainian public schools when parents drive their children to school. And they know very well what the latest models of iPhones and other gadgets are that some students of the same public and perpetually underfunded schools have.

The state initiative de facto creates a situation where ordinary taxpayers (in Ukraine, these are not large corporations, but ordinary workers) will finance lunches for the children of local businessmen, judges, prosecutors, and officials who can easily pay for their own children’s meals. The largest share of tax revenues in the Ukrainian budget is personal income tax, and it is ordinary Ukrainians who will pay for this semi-communist initiative.

In Ukraine, it would be quite possible to introduce free meals for children in the future, after the victory, when we have enough of everything and don’t know what else to spend the money on. But not when we are standing with our hand outstretched to the world and our army lacks weapons. When our military plants have no sales because the state has no money to pay them for weapons. Social policy is always good when there is extra money for it, when the country can afford to eat because there is something to earn, but not when the enemy is capturing Ukrainian villages and cities and we do not have enough money to defend our independence.

With its free school meals initiative, Ukraine is like an unemployed homeless man who walks into a bar and buys everyone a drink. Moreover, such wastefulness will certainly encourage populist forces in European countries and in the United States to demand that financial aid to Ukraine be cut off if it has money for things that Americans and Germans do not. For example, how would Donald Trump and American conservatives or opposition German and French opinion leaders comment on this? And how would their voters then change their percentage in opinion polls regarding the continuation of military and financial assistance to Ukraine?

It’s no secret that the entire “civilian” part of the Ukrainian budget is financed by foreign aid, while our economy works for the army. It is quite possible to assume that foreign partners advised that their money be spent purely on social needs, and not, God forbid, on a defense war against Russia. But for some reason, the Ukrainian government has not found other critically problematic civilian areas to direct these funds to, so as not to arouse envy and reproaches, including from foreign partners. The leftist policy of eating and wasting, of giving away taxpayers’ money for free, especially when not backed by a strong economy, has never led a country to prosperity, but has often led to disaster.

Author: Valeriy Maydanyuk

October 13, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Analytics

The “Christian Union” of the Netherlands – conservatism with a leftist bias

від Майданюк Валерій October 12, 2024

The Christian Union, the most “green”, center-left and “progressive Christian” party in the Netherlands, competes with the liberals for the youth vote.

There are two influential Christian democratic parties in the Netherlands that have a significant representation in the country’s parliament. One of them is the Christian Union (CU), a Christian democratic party founded in 2000 as a bloc of Christian political forces. Today, the party belongs to the parliamentary parties and has 4 seats out of 75 in the first chamber and 5 seats out of 150 in the second chamber of the General States. It also has 1 seat out of 25 allocated to the Netherlands in the European Parliament and is a member of the European Conservatives and Reformers faction.

Immediately after its creation, the Christian Union won parliamentary seats, and in the 2006 elections the party doubled its result and entered the government cabinet, where Christian Union leader Andre Ravout became Minister of Family and Youth Affairs. The Dutch Christian Union calls itself a Christian social party and combines conservative views on ethical issues and foreign policy with a center-left vision of economic, social and environmental aspects of public life. The party advocates abolishing abortion and euthanasia, ending the policy of tolerance for soft drugs, combating pornography and prostitution, restricting the use of genetic engineering, allowing civil servants to refuse to register same-sex marriages, and protecting freedom of education, including the right to establish religious schools.

At the same time, the party advocates the preservation of the state system of education, health care and social security, and an increase in the openness of policy towards migrants, especially those who are persecuted for religious reasons. The party also actively initiates the development of green energy, which is why the Dutch Christian Union is called the green Christian party.

The party calls itself a “progressive Christian” party and declares a number of social initiatives inherent in social democratic programs, including equal working conditions and an effective social protection system.

Among its initiatives, the Dutch Christian Union proposes mandatory state basic insurance and a 10% increase in the minimum hourly wage, especially for young people. Standing for the protection of workers’ rights, the party advocates serious financial penalties for employers if there are no reasonable grounds for dismissing an employee. The Christian Union calls for “fire and sword” to fight all forms of discrimination in the labor market between men and women, and promotes equal pay for equal work, including between Dutch workers and migrant workers.

The Christian Union in the Netherlands declares center-right initiatives to reduce the income tax from 37% now to 35% up to an income of 70,000 euros. The maximum tax rate will be 50%. At the same time, the party is not against raising taxes for the richest on various forms of wealth that are currently not or hardly taxed, which brings its economic policy closer to elements of left-wing political platforms.

Social assistance, according to the Christian Union program, should be increased in line with the minimum wage, and individual assistance to homeless young people is needed. However, in a quite conservative vein, the party is convinced that employment is the best social security that will reduce dependence on state benefits. Instead, the Christian Union proposes to increase the retirement age in line with the increase in life expectancy.

Regarding Islam in the Netherlands, the Christian Union advocates an inclusive society in which everyone can participate on the basis of equality, regardless of whether one is Christian, Muslim or non-believer. For the party, protecting religious minorities also means protecting centuries-old religious traditions, such as ritual slaughter, although the party also advocates for guaranteed animal welfare. This left-liberal rhetoric, combined with conservative and center-right positions, is due to the fact that the party is now competing fiercely for the votes of young people and the electorate that does not regularly attend church, and is therefore trying to add more attractive electoral slogans.

Author: Valeriy Maydanyuk

October 12, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Analytics

Conservatism and progress

від Майданюк Валерій October 6, 2024

Opponents of conservatism often falsely accuse conservatives of “opposing progress” and portray conservatives as amateurs Ciddle ages in monk’s robes, burning books, and seeking to preserve and cover anything new with a century-old web of darkness. Unfortunately, many people believe in this myth, despite the fact that conservatives have been the greatest drivers of progress from World War II to the present day.

The largest bursts of economic and technological development in the West in the second half of the twentieth century were during the years of Conservative rule. The “economic miracle” of Germany and Italy in the 1950s and 1960s, when new plants and factories sprouted like mushrooms after rain, technology developed, and civic welfare increased, which helped to develop culture and music, occurred during the rule of Christian Democrats Konrad Adenauer and Alcide de Gasperi.

Throughout the second half of the twentieth century, Britain was called the “sick man of Europe,” losing ground and experiencing economic stagnation. It was only during the years of Margaret Thatcher’s conservative government that the country’s economy took off. Many of her ideas, which were radical at the time, have now become part of the mainstream. Millions of new shareholders appeared in the country – the British became a real “nation of new capitalists”. During the 11 years of Thatcher’s rule, production in the country grew by 3-4% annually. The United Kingdom ranked second in the world in terms of labor productivity growth, after Japan. It was Thatcher who achieved complete energy independence of the country, creating conditions for modern oil production technologies. On this financial cushion, Her Majesty’s subjects could develop rock and roll, music, culture, and cinema – because neither the Beatles nor the Rolling Stones would have ever emerged in a poor, corrupt, and hungry country. And no matter what those who call themselves “progressives” today say about conservatives, it was conservatives who laid the financial foundation for progressive cultural trends in the 1970s and 1980s.

It was during the Reaganomics in the United States, which became a policy of overcoming the economic crisis under the leadership of Republican conservatives, that a real “conservative revolution” took place. A real rearmament of the American army began, new technologies were developed, and work began on creating a missile defense with elements of space weapons (the so-called Strategic Defense Initiative or Star Wars program). After all, the most iconic films of American cinema were released at the peak of economic development under the conservative presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. New space achievements and new technologies were intensively developed with the assistance of those whom the leftists today are trying to pass off as “enemies of progress.”

Conservatives have never denied change and evolution if it was necessary and effective, and not change to simply change something from the tried and true to the new, whose effectiveness is not obvious. Those who today call themselves “progressives” and ridicule “medieval conservatives” actually have very little in common with true progress, as development for the public good. Conservatives are against social experiments on people, against doing things just to try and see what happens. Conservatives have never been enemies of progress – on the contrary, they have often led it when it was beneficial to society.

Author: Valeriy Maydanyuk

October 6, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Analytics

Christian Social Union – strength in unity

від Майданюк Валерій October 5, 2024

The German CDU’s relations with its sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), are partnerships based on ideological cooperation, although they have not always been cloudless.

The CSU is a more center-right and more conservative political force. Being a coalition partner with the CDU at the federal level and forming a single faction in the Bundestag, the CSU retains its independence in terms of organization.

Founded in Munich in 1945 on the basis of Bavarian Christian Socialist political forces and organizations, the CSU refused Konrad Adenauer’s proposal to merge with the Christian Democrats and remained independent. The CSU pursues its own policy in Bavaria, which best meets the interests of this predominantly Catholic federal state, which is also one of the richest states in Germany. Bavaria has achieved such success, to a large extent, under the leadership of the CSU, which has been the ruling party in Bavaria for more than half a century and heads the state government. Today, the CSU has the largest share of members with a university degree among German parties – 39%.

Known as a party of Eurosceptic positions, the CSU stands for a regionally and nationally stable Europe based on the principles of federalism and subsidiarity. In cooperation with a dozen other European Christian Democratic and conservative parties, the CSU initiated the creation of the European People’s Party in 1976 and has been represented there with seven to ten members since the first European Parliament elections.

In 1976, the CDU and the CSU almost split after the CDU/CSU bloc was defeated in the parliamentary elections. Some CSU leaders then suggested dissolving the party alliance with the CDU, but a month later the crisis was resolved and the joint factional association functions on the basis of the “Agreement on the Continuation of the Factional Association between the CDU and the CSU.”

The inter-party agreement of 2017 declares that fundamental decisions of the CDU/CSU faction are made only with the consent of both groups. And the CSU may have an opinion on particularly important issues that differs from the majority of the faction, which it can defend independently in the Bundestag. In fact, the CDU leadership recognizes the right of the Bavarian partner party to vote separately from the position of the majority of the union faction. Thus, the two ideologically related political parties act as partners on the basis of broad autonomy and, having divided the spheres of federal influence, do not enter into a race with each other.

Author: Valeriy Maydanyuk

October 5, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Ukraine

Families of Mariupol prisoners oppose change of leadership of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine

від Юрій Гончаренко October 5, 2024

The NGO “Strength of the Marines” has expressed its strong protest against the possible dismissal of Lieutenant General Kyrylo Budanov, Head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and Head of the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War.

According to the organization’s representatives, such changes could have a negative impact on the prisoner of war exchange process, which is currently being established under Budanov’s leadership. They emphasize that during his two years as head of the Coordination Headquarters, Kyrylo Budanov maintained constant contact with the families of the Mariupol garrison prisoners.

“Everything that has been done and is being done for every prisoner of war and their families is an example of conscientious work. The well-established work has resulted in these long-awaited exchanges that every family is waiting for with bated breath,” the statement said.

Representatives of families, friends and those who care about the fate of the captured heroes of Mariupol express their categorical disapproval of the possible change of leadership of the Coordination Center. They fear that this could halt the ongoing exchange process.

“The Mariupol garrison, the 36th Brigade, along with other brigades, have a very complicated process of returning our heroes from captivity. In our opinion, and the opinion of all the families, the change of the heads of the working group may suspend the ongoing exchange process,” the Marine Corps emphasizes.

The organization calls on the state leadership to “do everything possible to support the structures involved in the exchanges, to hear the families of prisoners of war and not to make changes.”

October 5, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Ukraine

Zaluzhnyi supported the call of a well-known volunteer to defend Budanov

від Юрій Гончаренко October 3, 2024

Former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valeriy Zaluzhnyi supported the statement of volunteer and head of the Charitable Foundation Diana Podolianchuk, in which she called for an end to insinuations about the possible resignation of the Chief of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine Kyrylo Budanov.

In her statement, Podolianchuk noted that together with Budanov, her charitable foundation had managed to implement a number of large-scale projects, including the purchase of Sich drones and Magura maritime drones, which effectively eliminated the Russian fleet in the Black Sea.
“Kyrylo is a responsible, brave and incredibly cool person. He is a leader who is directly involved in combat operations and is always on the front line with his soldiers… I hope that the authorities will immediately refute the rumors about Budanov’s “possible resignation”. After all, unity is our strength in the fight against a common enemy,” said Diana Podolianchuk.

The former head of the Armed Forces, Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, responded to this post with a “heart”. The volunteer was also supported by writers Andriy Kokotyukha and Anatoliy Dnistrovy, musician Oleskandr “Fozzy” Sydorenko, journalist and released prisoner Volodymyr Fomichev, soldiers Ruslan Kahanets and Oleksandr Hrom, volunteers and bloggers.

In recent days, there have been many rumors about Budanov’s possible resignation from the post of the Chief of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine. Popular anonymous telegram channels were among the first to spread such rumors, followed by second-tier political experts.

Finally, on the evening of October 1, the Day of Defenders, President Zelensky posted a photo of himself with Defense Minister Umerov (whose resignation was also announced by anonymous telegram channels) and Kyrylo Budanov, which could have been a demonstration of the absence of conflict between the president and the security forces.

At the same time, observers recalled that a joint photo of the president and Zaluzhnyi was also published on Zelensky’s pages on the eve of the former chief’s resignation.

The very next day, on October 2, the Association of Families of Azovstal Defenders published a statement on its telegram channel calling on the government not to dismiss Budanov as responsible for the exchange of prisoners of war.

“As the head of the Coordination Headquarters, Kyrylo Budanov has been in constant contact with the families of the Mariupol garrison prisoners for more than two years. Prior to that, during the defense of Mariupol in 2022, he participated in the organization of an air operation of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine, which delivered numerous medicines, ammunition and reinforcement personnel to the besieged units in Mariupol,” the Association of Families of Azovstal Defenders said.

In their opinion, the change of the Chief of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine could suspend the exchange of prisoners of war. Later, telegram channels close to the OP began to deny rumors of Kyrylo Budanov’s alleged resignation from the post of DIU chief.

On October 2, Valeriy Zaluzhnyi spoke at the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham, where he said that Ukraine, together with its partners, must win the war against Russia.

October 3, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Analytics

Fighting poverty or catching up to the bottom of the EU

від Майданюк Валерій September 30, 2024

An extremely important task for Ukrainians after the Russian aggression is stopped is economic recovery and overcoming poverty, which is nothing but a loss of human dignity.

Most people in Ukraine are able to earn the equivalent of an average apartment in their lifetime. Another part can afford to buy it in installments, spending the rest of the money to maintain a certain standard of living. Many people, especially pensioners and the disabled, constantly live below the poverty line, allowing themselves only the most basic necessities. All of this causes many people to lose their dignity – many fall into the temptation of alcoholism, some become criminals. However, the majority of people are constantly busy with the problem of survival, struggling to exist in a social system that is not fully just, where the government is far removed from people’s problems and the need to solve them.

Many people believe that most politicians are interested in this state of affairs because it is much easier to govern a poor and oppressed people than a wealthy and free one. In fact, the Ukrainian political system is deeply sick, as most politicians in power are not primarily concerned with fighting poverty and improving the welfare of Ukrainians, but rather with access to media and financial resources, as these two components are the main conditions for their success in the current political system.

Changing the economic situation in Ukraine by giving people access to quality education and at least low- and medium-paid jobs by EU standards will change the social situation, giving most people the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of the real estate market, quality food, education, leisure and recreation, and culture. The growth of consumer opportunities for Ukrainians will provide an internal drive for economic development, which in turn will bring new taxes to the budget

This is one of the most important tasks of the next few decades. Reducing unemployment and the proportion of people living below the poverty line are the tasks for true statesmen.

Suggestions:

  • Reduce poverty by half over the next 10 years by developing the labor market and creating about 3-5 million new jobs
  • Promote the growth of wages, including the minimum wage
  • Promotethe formation of a class of small private owners, both farmers in rural areas and entrepreneurs in urban areas, stimulating self-employment, cooperatives and family businesses in particular
  • Creating conditions for employment and the return of millions of migrant workers.

Author: Yuriy Mindyuk

September 30, 2024
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappTelegramViberEmail
Новіші
Старіші

ВАЖЛИВЕ

Who forms the “hawkish” wing of the US...

January 22, 2026

Stepan Tomashivsky is a conservative who warned of...

December 28, 2025

A Pole who believed in Ukraine earlier than...

December 26, 2025

Being yourself and not pretending: how conservatism is...

December 10, 2025

MAGA as a new ideology of American conservatism

December 7, 2025

UKRAINIAN EXPERTS TALKS’S PODCAST

Новини

  • The Conservative Platform has gathered the best scholars to launch a systematic work on debunking Russian myths

    December 1, 2025
  • Budanov has a sober view of geopolitics and leads an effective team – blogger

    July 3, 2025
  • CDU/CSU leader pays support visit to Kyiv

    December 9, 2024
  • With the help of Russia, the Taliban wants to build an air defense of Afghanistan

    September 11, 2024
  • Americans to deploy Typhon missiles capable of reaching Russia on Japanese islands – media

    September 10, 2024
Назад Вперед

Спротив.News

«
Prev
1
/
213
Next
»
loading
play
Мінуснули три мости за раз! Сили оборони ламають логістику окупантів на ТОТ!
play
Крим переходить у режим ізоляції? Окупанти скасовують масові заходи до 1 вересня!
play
«Гордість, Єдність, Мрія»? Як РФ перетворює День молоді на ТОТ на шоу пропаганди
«
Prev
1
/
213
Next
»
loading

Реалізується ГО Фонд сприяння демократії за підтримки Фонду Ганнса Зайделя в Україні

Copyright © 2017 Фонд сприяння демократії Наші Політика конфіденційності,  Умови використання сайту
Facebook Youtube Telegram Spotify Instagram Linkedin
Консервативна Платформа
  • News
    • Analytics
    • Worldview
    • Anti-imperial front
    • Weapons
    • Geopolitics
  • publication
  • Position.
  • Events.

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close
  • Українська (Ukrainian)
  • English